![who directed the da vinci code who directed the da vinci code](https://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/archive/news/images/full/davinci_code_f.jpg)
Pre-production was going to be gearing up. The filmmakers were looking to return to Italy the following year for shooting of the next in the series, with key locations including Rome and Vatican City. This complaint was made in June of 2007 (over a year after the film’s release), and the timing was significant.
![who directed the da vinci code who directed the da vinci code](https://truthnet.org/Christianity/Cults/Davincicode/davinciplot1.jpg)
Who directed the da vinci code movie#
The complaint argued that The Da Vinci Code movie was in breach of Article 528 of Italy’s penal code.
![who directed the da vinci code who directed the da vinci code](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e1/10/fe/e110fec5a041fc057a4c043aef467dd9.jpg)
Yet in the Italian village of Civitavecchia (some 40 miles north of Rome), things were taken further.įollowing a complaint by a group of Catholic clergy, as reported in Film Review magazine (August 2007 issue), the area’s state prosecutor agreed to open an investigation into the movie. The film was banned in many countries, and protests were organised against it in others on grounds of blasphemy. The Vatican took the release of the film in a measured way, with Cardinal Francis Arinze suggesting legal action, and Archbishop Angelo Amato asking that The Da Vinci Code movie be boycotted. Furthermore, even the making of the film was fraught with problems, when some potential locations were made unavailable due to the nature of the material. It’s little secret that The Da Vinci Code did not sit well with some religious groups. Yet there was a real threat that before that, Hanks, Howard and co could face prison time. It was a foregone conclusion that a second Langdon film would follow. By the time the film’s cinema run was done, $760m worldwide had been banked, ahead of a lucrative home formats release. But still, it didn’t stop the audiences rolling in. Reviews so bad that Howard was even moved to comment on them. The bum-numbing two and a half hour movie debuted at 2006’s Cannes Film Festival, to pretty hostile reviews. Just as with the book, critics be damned. Notwithstanding the fact that 2000’s Angels & Demons had already been published, Sony opted to hedge its bets and put the movie out without reference to other plot threads from the other novels, knowing it could refashion the earlier book as a sequel if required. Howard and Hanks’ involvement pushed the negative price up to $125m, and the film was made very much as a standalone feature as well. The Da Vinci Code project would see them reteam, but not before Howard had sounded out the late Bill Paxton about taking on the lead role. A feature film was thus pursued, and in came Sony.ĭirector Ron Howard and star Tom Hanks had memorably come together for 1995’s Oscar-nominated Apollo 13. The original reports suggested a plan to based a season of the show 24 around the book, but Dan Brown wasn’t keen on that. Never ones to be swayed by the whims of critical feedback (cough), a bidding war took place for the rights to make The Da Vinci Code movie, and it cost Sony Pictures $6m before a syllable of a screenplay had been written. Unsurprisingly, then, the story attracted the interest of Hollywood. Try three issues of Film Stories magazine – for just £4.99: right here!įive books have been published thus far charting the adventures of the fictional Harvard university professor.